Collaborative divorce presents numerous advantages over traditional litigated divorce. By fostering open communication and cooperation between you and your spouse, it can help reduce conflict and avoid drawn out litigation. This is particularly advantageous in cases involving children, as it encourages a more positive co-parenting dynamic from the outset. Additionally, collaborative divorce empowers you and your legal team to craft agreements that cater to your individual needs and interests, as opposed to a ruling from a Judge being imposed upon you.
Financially, collaborative divorce is typically more cost-effective than litigation, as it often requires fewer court appearances and can reduce the time spent on contentious (and needless) legal battles. This translates to lower attorney fees and overall divorce expenses. More importantly, collaborative divorce provides a supportive environment, often including mental health professionals and other neutral experts who can offer assistance and help parties navigate some of the most difficult decisions.
Please note that collaborative divorce does require that both parties agree to retain trained collaborative attorneys, and that you voluntarily engage in this alternative to traditional litigation. Your commitment will be formalized through a participation agreement at the outset of the case. This ensures that all parties are fully invested in the collaborative approach, laying the groundwork for a constructive and mutually beneficial resolution process. Jess Couser is a trained collaborative attorney. She is a member of the International Association of Collaborative Professionals and she served on the Board of Directors of the Utah Association of Collaborative Professionals.